By Bruce Rabe
I recently visited the offices of several prospective clients, where I walked past training rooms and observed new hires hard at work - reading manuals or PDFs. I have no doubt that these companies firmly believe they are "training" these people.
Only they’re not.
Though I believe this is better than no training effort, in many cases what they’re doing is "stuffing" knowledge into the heads of trainees and hoping for the best. They can then "check the box" to seemingly prove that these new hires are ready to work independently.
If you think I'm being too critical, consider this: How much of what you read does your brain retain? Not that much, right? Imagine reading densely-worded documents of dos and don'ts for 6 or more hours a day, and then trying to remember all that. It’s next to impossible. So why do we expect new workers to do it?
At a more fundamental level, reading information off of a page of a manual or a PDF isn’t really training because it doesn’t comply with the 3 M’s of training - which stand for meaningful, memorable and motivational, as cited by Michael Allen and Richard Sites in their book, Leaving Addie for Sam: An Agile Model for Developing the Best Learning Experiences.
Comments